Your Ad Here
2009 May 30 Saturday
Sonia Sotomayor On Criminal Voting Disenfranchisement

Barack Obama's pick for a top spot in the most elite legislature in America (what some call the Supreme Court), Judge Sonia Sotomayor, sees the disproportionate voting disenfranchisement of high crime minorities as a bad thing. Why is it that the Left just keeps wanting to break things that work?

In Hayden v. Pataki, a number of inmates in New York state filed suit claiming that because blacks and Latinos make up a disproportionate share of the prison population, the state's refusal to allow them ballot access amounts to an unlawful, race-based denial of their right to vote. Eight of 13 judges on the liberal-leaning Second Circuit dismissed their arguments, and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled likewise in a similar case.

Yet, operating on a dubious and extremely broad reading of the Voting Rights Act, Ms. Sotomayor dissented from the decision. In a remarkably dismissive, four-paragraph opinion, she alleged that the "plain terms" of the Voting Rights Act would allow such race-based claims to go forward.

Most voters are ignorant, irrational, and dumb. It is bad enough that we let all non-felon adult citizens vote. The idea of letting criminals vote is crazy.

More generally: we live in a society that has grown too fond of pretty lies.

On the bright side, segregation by class is demoralizing poor people and making them less likely to vote. This improves the intellectual quality of voters - all else equal. More likely, it just slows a decline in the quality of voters.

In the 1970s, whether an individual came from a low-, medium- or high-income county didn't seem to have any predictive effect on whether or not that person voted, though rich people still voted at greater rates than poor people. But over the past three decades, as the nation became more segregated by wealth, the effect of living in a poor county, independent of one's own wealth, became a significant predictor of whether an individual voted or not. In other words, while individual-level poverty has always been associated with less civic engagement, increasing class-based segregation is widening the participatory gap between rich and poor even further. The results are published in the spring issue of Political Science Quarterly.

The upper classes are becoming more motivated to vote with the opposite happening with the lower classes. Sounds like good news to me.

By Randall Parker    2009 May 30 06:53 PM Entry Permalink | Comments (5)
Advertise here. Contact randall dot parker at ymail dot com
 
Web parapundit.com
Site Traffic Info