Your Ad Here
2012 November 25 Sunday
UK Economic Stagnation Started In 2000

Tyler "Great Stagnation" Cowen points to a graph that shows the UK economy hasn't grown starting in the year 2000.

Why? Labour Party policies probably are at least partly to blame. Immigration could be a contributor as well if the UK's immigration has been more toward the low-skilled as in America. But natural resource limitations played a big role. Tthe UK took a big hit when North Sea oil production peaked in 1999 and then went into rapid decline just as world oil prices started rising rapidly. You can see in table 4 how world oil production growth went thru successive downshifts starting in the early 1970s. The UK was insulated from the effects of this change due to North Sea production. So the down winds from higher oil prices and lower production growth really kicked in for the UK starting in 2000.

Here are some more economic stagnation charts from The Guardian. Make your browser maximized before you maximize those charts. The resizing does not work well.

Then are the Western countries doomed to continued economic stagnation due to heightening competition for depleting natural resources and worsening demographic conditions? Well, I see a couple rays of hope. Michael Pettis argues that China's economy is so fundamentally unbalanced that its growth rate is slowing and therefore its growing demand for natural resources is slowing or even reversing in some cases. Pettis sees a big overbuilding of world mining capacity which he expects will cause a several years of lower prices for at least some commodities. This will help the Western countries somewhat. But, short of a depression, high oil prices will continue to weigh down the OECD countries.

So we've reached a point where misfortunes in some countries (e.g. southern Europe and China) cut commodities demand enough to allow the economies of other countries to grow. Welcome to the 21st century.

Share |      By Randall Parker at 2012 November 25 03:18 PM 


Comments
Walter "Heisenberg" White said at November 27, 2012 9:47 PM:

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


Post a comment
Comments:
Name (not anon or anonymous):
Email Address:
URL:
Remember info?

      
 
Web parapundit.com
Go Read More Posts On ParaPundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright ©