2008 August 24 Sunday
US Federal Reserve Holds Interest Rates Low To Help Banks

The central bank of the United States basically is transferring money from everyone else to bail out banks.

Ben S. Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, rejects that thinking, as do a majority of the Fed’s policy makers. They argue — and several of them repeated their arguments in interviews here that were mostly off the record — that they had no choice but to cut the key lending rate that the Fed controls to 2 percent from 5.25 percent in just eight months. Otherwise, they said, the housing and credit crises would have resulted in much more damage to the economy.

The Fed is basically using low interest rates to subsidize banks. The low interest rates boost inflation and therefore take money away from everyone else. The money gets transferred ot banks. The Fed exists to protect bank shareholders. You pay bank shareholders via inflation and via lower interest rates you get paid on bank accounts and bonds.

Now, they argue, the so-called federal funds rate must be kept at 2 percent — for no one knows how long — so that banks and other lenders can borrow at low rates and lend at higher ones, using their fattened earnings from this process to rebuild the capital they need. The banks’ capital eroded as numerous loans made during the bubble years went bad and were written off, reducing their ability and willingness to lend to the public.

“Lenders have been hit by a shock so severe that they are contracting and withdrawing from private sector lending,” Janet L. Yellen, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, said in an interview.

Lower interest rates mean that if you are a saver and put your money into certificates of deposit (CDs) at banks then you get paid less. Basically, part of the money to help banks recover is getting taken from you and the interest rate you get paid isn't enough to keep ahead of inflation. You aren't compensated for this. You aren't getting shares in these banks in exchange for helping to build up their capital reserves.

Do the rest of us derive a big enough benefit to make subsidizing banks in this fashion justified for the common good?

Share |      By Randall Parker at 2008 August 24 08:05 PM  Economics Financial


Comments
HellKaiserRyo said at August 24, 2008 8:34 PM:

"Do the rest of us derive a big enough benefit to make subsidizing banks in this fashion justified for the common good?"

I do not know enough about economics to answer that; but I do know this: to many people here (given some of the libertarian biases of the commenters), "common good" doesn't exist. It is just socialist rhetoric.

Big Bill said at August 25, 2008 4:31 AM:

Sad to say that it has come to this, but one can abandon the US currency and hold savings in foreign-denominated funds if necessary.

It does seem clear that our betters have abandoned us. They are trying to extract the last bit of value from us that they can.

My wife is convinced that they are bound and determined to destroy the dollar as part of a global
churn and burn" strategy: run some currencies up and others down, and make their money on the transactions.

She also sees it as a first step in creating the "Amero" (or whatever it will be called). The dollar must be debased and degraded before it can be married off to the Mexican peso.

z said at August 25, 2008 2:29 PM:

Do you banking at a CREDIT UNION and screw the FED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pay OFF your HOUSE also. You can invest in gold, foreign currency, T-bills with guaranteed returns, stocks, corporate bonds. CD's and savings accounts and money market accounts just suck now. They dont pay anything

averros said at August 27, 2008 3:21 AM:

> It does seem clear that our betters have abandoned us.

They never were "with us". The bunch of robbers who were in power for nearly a century is close to bleeding the productive part of population dry; there's no reason to work hard and save when most of it gets confiscated through taxes and inflation.

Well, USA is quite well along the same road as the USSR. In many respects ordinary citizens of the USSR had more freedoms than today's Americans (I don't remember being searched or fingerprinted once for all the years I lived there - but it became depressingly regular procedure here in US - and I do not get caught doing anything illegal - it's just routine "security").

I'll cheer when this murderous monstrosity called the federal government finally goes bankrupt, and when its ugly green IOUs will become a nice affordable material for kitty boxes.


Post a comment
Comments:
Name (not anon or anonymous):
Email Address:
URL:
Remember info?

      
 
Web parapundit.com
Go Read More Posts On ParaPundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright ©