2007 October 27 Saturday
Hispanics Ethnically Cleanse Blacks From LA
Audacious Epigone reports on the ethnic cleansing of blacks from areas of Los Angeles by Hispanic gangs.
Perhaps La Raza and the NAACP should see this as a priority, more urgent than the fabricated 'hate crimes' of various MinuteMen chapters:
A south Los Angeles Latino street gang targeted African-American gang rivals and other blacks in a campaign of neighborhood "cleansing," federal prosecutors say. Alleged leaders and foot soldiers in the Hispanic gang Florencia 13, also called F13, are being arraigned this week on charges stemming from a pair of federal indictments that allege that the gang kept a tight grip on its turf by shooting members of a rival gang—and sometimes random black civilians. The "most disturbing aspect" of the federal charges was that "innocent citizens … ended up being shot simply because of the color of their skin," U.S. Attorney Thomas O'Brien told reporters in announcing the indictments.Thought tribalism had died out in the West? Like tuberculosis, it's returning. Half of all Los Angelenos are Hispanic, and their numbers are growing. Only 11% are black. It's a losing proposition for the old Crips and Bloods (I've heard from multiple people that the two rival gangs are uniting in some cities, but I've not seen anything definitive. If anyone has, please make it known in the comments).
The web site BlackAmericaWeb.com reports Los Angeles has no-go areas for blacks.
There’s no physical sign, barrier or even a chalk line that marks the zone where a black can’t enter at the risk of grave harm. But the zone is there, and blacks know that if they enter it they can be beat, shot at or killed. The twist is that the forbidden zone is not in a redneck, backwoods town in a Southern state during the rigid and violent Jim Crow segregation era. The bigger twist is that the Klan, Neo-Nazis, racist skinheads and bikers didn’t establish the racially restrictive zone. Purported Latino gang members established it. The forbidden zone is in a small, mixed ethnic bedroom community in Los Angeles. The year is 2007, not 1947.
A black family that recently fled the community in fear for their lives bluntly told a reporter that they left because blacks there are scared to death. In the past year, the hate terror escalated to the point where blacks tell tormenting tales of being harried when they leave their homes, or their children walk to school. They say that they are forbidden to go into a park, and a convenience store.
We need maps on the internet that show ethnic no-go areas with some style of coding the areas so you can know how great the risks are and how the risks vary by time of day. That way you could avoid accidentally going somewhere that could lead to harm against you.
The left-leaning web site Alternet confirms LA gangs enforce color lines.
"The way I hear these knuckleheads tell it, they don't want their neighborhoods infested with blacks, as if it's an infestation," says respected Los Angeles gang expert Tony Rafael, who interviewed several Latino street gang leaders for an upcoming book on the Mexican Mafia, the dominant Latino gang in Southern California. "It's pure racial animosity that manifests itself in a policy of a major criminal organization."
"There's absolutely no motive absent the color of their skin," adds former Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney Michael Camacho. Before he became a judge, in 2003, Camacho successfully prosecuted a Latino gang member for the random shootings of three black men in Pomona, Calif.
"They generally don't like African Americans," Pomona gang unit officer Marcus Perez testified in that case. "If an African American enters their neighborhood, they're likely to be injured or killed."
Imagine whites were doing this sort of thing. The media would be extremely outraged. But curiously Hispanics are held to a different standard. This gets reported, but not a lot. Why is that? I can think of a number of reasons. But I'm not sure which reason is most important. My guess is that liberal white reporters are far more keen to score status points against poorly behaving whites than they are to score points against Hispanics. In a sense they are secretly racist and actually think they get a bigger boost by showing themselves morally superior to another white than to a black or Hispanic.
Where do these ethnic purger Hispanic gang members come from? Heather Mac Donald says most are illegal aliens and yet police are forced to turn a blind eye on their illegal status.
Police commanders may not want to discuss, much less respond to, the illegal-alien crisis, but its magnitude for law enforcement is startling. Some examples:
• In Los Angeles, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide (which total 1,200 to 1,500) target illegal aliens. Up to two-thirds of all fugitive felony warrants (17,000) are for illegal aliens.
• A confidential California Department of Justice study reported in 1995 that 60 percent of the 20,000-strong 18th Street Gang in southern California is illegal; police officers say the proportion is actually much greater. The bloody gang collaborates with the Mexican Mafia, the dominant force in California prisons, on complex drug-distribution schemes, extortion, and drive-by assassinations, and commits an assault or robbery every day in L.A. County. The gang has grown dramatically over the last two decades by recruiting recently arrived youngsters, most of them illegal, from Central America and Mexico.
• The leadership of the Columbia Lil’ Cycos gang, which uses murder and racketeering to control the drug market around L.A.’s MacArthur Park, was about 60 percent illegal in 2002, says former assistant U.S. attorney Luis Li. Francisco Martinez, a Mexican Mafia member and an illegal alien, controlled the gang from prison, while serving time for felonious reentry following deportation.
I say deport all the illegal aliens since our population is too high. That'll cut the size of the gangs by more than half. That will also cut out future supply of gang members.
There was a time when the lies, hypocrisy and just plain incompetence of the MSM used to bother me, but not so much any more - I just don't pay any attention to them now. We all know how the MSM misreported and just plain lied about the "Jena 6" and the "Duke rape hoax," but here's a genuine case of racially motivated violence and even ethnic cleansing against black Americans right in the middle of a major American city, and it seldom gets reported. Wonder why?
Only white people can do bad things or be racist. And when black and hispanics behave like savages, it can always be blamed on whites, i.e. "institutional racism" or whatever.
Or, it could be that we have leading elements who are actually delighted by the increase of conflict, and will eventually get to the point that they'd cheer the whites on for instigating racial violence in the above manner as well, if the goal were to get dictatorship, and it were close enough to drop pretenses and go for the jugular. One INVARIANT of policy and progressive attitudes is: always do what increases conflict in society, even if this means changing policy and stated principles 180 degrees.
Guilty: It's funny how it's usually other whites that do the blaming.
Whites brought the slaves to America. Whites also created the destructive multicultural policies we live with today.
Take responsibility for you actions.
Actually, I went off half-cocked in the previous comment. But I do wonder why so much derision is aimed at minorities when it's quite clear that other whites are responsible for our current milieu.
Minorities just aren't influential enough to lobby for increased immigration or affirmative action, for instance. But whites surely are.
Some might satisfaction from what could mistakenly be seen as a sort of replacement, man-for-man, of black thugs for Hispanic thugs. But that's not what's happening. Hispanics, fueled by a burgeoning illegal influx, are winning turf wars and taking over areas that used to be dominated mostly by black thugs. So the black thugs are going elsewhere. The end result is more thugs holding more ground, with lots of racial animosity thrown into the mix. Nothing good comes of this.
Try removing racial identifiers and you will see the root of the problem. The citizens do not have the necessary influence over their government. The captains of industry and credit are the ones directing this play. I've seen the conclusion and it ain't pretty. Maybe that's why the white population is shrinking; they are cutting their losses and running for the exits.
Uraguay, I think you have a point, the "creative distruction" of multi-culturalism does to some extent, create increased business opportunities for big business, at the expense of bread and butter small-scale business.
For example, in the real estate industry, white flight creates opportunities for big developers in up and coming cities. Meanwhile hard-arsed immigrant businessmen take up the opportunities of being the slum landlords in the multi-cultural big cities.
However, its seems unlikely this process is sustainable as it basically treats land, infrastructure and communities as disposable resources.
The fact is that the term 'racism' as used in the USA and western Europe is really just a weasel word disguising the real intentions and beliefs of the user who casually bandies the word about.
Exclusively, 'anti-racism' really denotes policies designed to emasculate, bully, brow-beat and disenfranchise Whites and White males in particular.
As we can see in LA an incipient racial war - with the most dire and terrible of consequences- seems to be brewing between blacks and hispanics, the violence, intimidation, thuggery and murder already manifesting make the alleged abuses in the 'Jim Crow' South seem like a tea-party in comparison, but the media is silent.
Because Whitey is not involved.
Cody, sad but true. Whites are our own worst enemies:
(Assuming that this jerkoff is white)
And I read that in Iowa, "diversity" is now the most important thing, but I can't find the story.
And to be honest, I can't say that I am all that upset about blacks and hispanics killing each other.
let them all kill each other off, I say.
I mean, what kind of positive impact on socirty will a bunch off illegal gangbangers have.
"I glad they're dead and I hope they burn in hell!"
These hate crimes are created and instigated by the prison systems in America. Black thugs and Hispanic thugs play out a role of control in those Cali prisons, and then influence the growing population, especially the illegal imigrants, gangs, and criminals. It makes sense then that their influence directly effects the growing number of youth, gangs, and soon to be criminals. Next we have a growing underprivledged Hispanic population struggling to gain strong representation in Cali. Mixed with blacks who are poor, they clash due to the high number of criminals living in Cali. As a result, even good Blacks who don't deserve crime become an easy target. This creates this racist killing of blacks. A line should be crossed when innocent people are being targeted. Every American has a moral right to step in when any citizen is a victim of a hate crime. So who is to blame? Many beleive whites have a moral right to step in and solve the problem, as they hold the power within the infrustructure of the U.S. If innocent white children die, it makes national headlines, such as Laci Peterson. That is why blacks are quick to put the blame on whites. And yes, that is institutional racism. California needs to enforce better race relations. Also they need trained cops who are equiped to handle the ugly.
1. close the US-Mexican border.
2. Mexico is 3rd world nation infested with drugs, poverty, poor, gangs, drugs and poor poor poor.
3. USA is 1st world nation with 3rd world Nation on our southern border.
4. USA cannot afford to have massive 3rd world nation on our southern border or USA will become 3rd world Nation.