2007 May 04 Friday
Canadian Spouse Immigrants Go On Welfare

The Candian government has started going after people who do not pay for welfare costs of foreigners they bring into Canada.

Nedzad Dzihic, a 37-year-old Bosnian immigrant, did not marry Edina Zurko. Instead, according to court documents, she used him as a ticket to Canada and then dumped him almost as soon as she arrived, on Feb. 25, 2003.

An embarrassed Mr. Dzihic promptly informed Citizenship and Immigration Canada, according to the documents filed Friday in Ontario Superior Court of Justice. He says he never saw her again and assumed the government had deported Ms. Zurko.

Instead, Mr. Dzihic was shocked last year to get a bill from the Ontario government to repay thousands of dollars his former girlfriend has been collecting since she went on welfare in June of 2006.

Mr. Dzihic is suing the national and provincial governments to halt their attempts to collect money from him. Gotta say, I'm ambivalent about this one. On the one hand, I think people who bring others into a country should be financially responsible for them. On the other hand, if the original reason for bringing a person (e.g. a marriage that never happens) ceases to exist then why does the government allow the would-be immigrant to remain in the country and collect welfare?

The Canadian government has a serious flaw in its immigration policy. The Canadian government should not allow people to come into Canada based on a reason they can abandon shortly after they arrive. Marriages to foreigners ought to have some sort of vesting period before a spouse gains permanent residency rights. But people who bring in foreigners should be on the hook for some of the costs. They should put up a bond which they lose if the person they bring in becomes a criminal or needs expensive medical care or creates other costs for society.

This idea of placing more costs on those who bring in foreigners should get extended into the realm of the labor market. In the United States employers who bring in visa workers should be required to buy medical insurance and to put up bonds that they lose if a worker they bring in commits criminal acts or damages the property of others.

In the United States some immigrants bring their parents over and then dump the care of their parents onto the welfare system. Some who do this are quite affluent and successful Asians. Such people should be required to prepay years of future medical insurance and the government should bill the children for any welfare services the parents used.

People and companies who dump costs on taxpayers are part of general growing problem where profits get privatized and costs get socialized. We need to stop treating legal residency and citizenship as prizes we give to lucky foreign winners.

Share |      By Randall Parker at 2007 May 04 08:28 PM  Immigration Economics

John S Bolton said at May 4, 2007 11:24 PM:

This is a main part of why one should oppose family-preference immigration policies.
If immigrants can't qualify individually, there's a reason for that:
they're lacking in merit, or, in merit relative to a particular country.
If one looks at such cases hot-heartedly,
as a being given over to unstoppable seizures of empathetic emotion,
one will ignore the consideration of the aggression on the net taxpayer,
which is increased through family-privilege immigration.
The net taxpayer of our citizenry is one to whom loyalty is owed, when a foreigner tries to bring in his relatives on net public subsidy.
For generations, almost no one has emphasized this point on the minimum loyalties needed for the nation to exist;
but when many do, the rumblings will go out to liquify the underpinnings
of the tranzi threat to the continuity of civilization.

Matra said at May 5, 2007 9:24 AM:

He says he never saw her again and assumed the government had deported Ms. Zurko.

In a proper functioning civilised society that would be a safe assumption. That he assumed such a deportation would occur in Canada tells me he doesn't know much about the country he lives in.

Mensarefugee said at May 5, 2007 11:45 AM:

Here in Canada we got guys who applied for refugee status, failed and are still here. Oh, and they are convicted rapists too.

I doubt anyone is going to care about little problems cause by the Zurkos of the world before clearing up the bigger messes.

No-PC-wars said at May 9, 2007 11:12 AM:

"In the United States some immigrants bring their parents over and then dump the care of their parents onto the welfare system. Some who do this are quite affluent and successful Asians."

Some immigrants? How about 80-90%?
I have never known an immigrant who have brought in his/her parents (about 90% of immigrants I knew) and supported them. After required period all parents were put on SSI (welfare for elderly).
Doesn't matter if some of those parents had multi-million dollar holdings in Taiwan, HongKong, India.

100% of Russian immigrants bring their parents in, 100% of those parents are on SSI.

This will never be resolved until a non-blind black leader will emerge and expose that theft of welfare resources that
are rightfully belong to African-American community :-).

Post a comment
Name (not anon or anonymous):
Email Address:
Remember info?

Web parapundit.com
Go Read More Posts On ParaPundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright