2007 April 21 Saturday
US Creating 7 Walled Gated Baghdad Communities

As a representative of a society whose elites celebrate multiculturalism, a US General has to deny that partition is the order of the day.

U.S. Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell IV, the top spokesman for coalition forces in Iraq, was quoted as saying Wednesday that he was unaware of any effort to build a wall dividing Shiite and Sunni enclaves in Baghdad and that such a tactic was not a policy of the Baghdad security plan.

"We have no intent to build gated communities in Baghdad," Stars and Stripes, the U.S. Department of Defense-authorized daily newspaper, quoted Caldwell as saying. "Our goal is to unify Baghdad, not subdivide it into separate [enclaves]."

Unity. Everyone can get along. There are no insurmountable differences between the peoples of the world. Kumbaya.

But what's that 3 mile long 12 foot high concrete barrier getting built across Baghdad?

In Adhamiyah, a restive section of northern Baghdad, paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division last week began erecting a 3-mile-long, 12-foot-high barrier around a Sunni enclave that's surrounded by predominantly Shiite neighborhoods. A single Iraqi army checkpoint now controls access into the Sunni area.

Why do American leaders need to pretend the rest of the world is all perfectly compatible with each other? Because our Open Borders elites have to defend that they aren't introducing incompatible elements by letting anyone come to America. Gotta defend the domestic faith even if doing so requires verbal somersaults to reconcile actions with stated policy.

Some call it apartheid. Some call it creation of ethnic ghettoes. But why not some positive spin? The US military is creating exclusive upscale gated communities. How about building some midget golf courses across rooftops too?

At the level of high level policy makers the belief that liberal universalism can create workable societies is still the defended faith. But down at the level of US field commanders liberal universalism is a dead faith killed by bombings and death squads.

Besides Adhamiyah, barriers are going up in Ghaziliyah, Khadra and Ameriyah in western Baghdad all Sunni areas and three are being built in the southern Rashid district in locations that officials didn't specify.

Military officials said it's only coincidence that so many of the enclaves are Sunni. Bleichwehl said the decision to erect barriers rests with commanders in the field.

Lots of walls are the only way the US can occupy Iraq with less than a half million soldiers. If Bush wants to pretend that his field commanders have enough troops to do the job then he's got to pretend that ethnic partition is liberal universalism.

The wall elements are prefabricated and trucked in.

The project for Adhamiya involves the building of a 3-mile wall along streets on its eastern flank. It consists of a series of concrete barriers, each weighing 14,000 pounds, that have been transportedto Baghdad from Camp Taji, north of the city. Soldiers are using cranes to put the barriers in place.

We could do the same thing to the US border with Mexico and cut off that source of illegal immigrants.

Also see my previous post Walls Bring Peace For Iraqis.

Update: I think the real interesting point here is that it took the extreme circumstances of a change of control of the US Congress to the Democrats with demands to end the war, a surge to about 150,000 US troops in Iraq, an extension of combat tours to 15 months, a few billion dollars a year getting wasted, thousands of US troops killed, and continued high levels of killings in Iraq to get the Bush Administration to the point where small scale partition became an acceptable option. Their faith is strong. Their willingness to accept the evidence of empirical reality quite a bit less so.

Share |      By Randall Parker at 2007 April 21 12:00 PM  MidEast Iraq Partition

lpg said at April 21, 2007 7:34 PM:

Was it Robert Frost who said something like "Good fences make good neighbors"?

Stephen said at April 21, 2007 8:29 PM:

...began erecting a 3-mile-long, 12-foot-high barrier around a Sunni enclave that's surrounded by predominantly Shiite neighborhoods. A single Iraqi army checkpoint now controls access into the Sunni area.

Sounds suspiciously like the Warsaw ghetto.

Randall Parker said at April 21, 2007 9:50 PM:


With thousands of years of history to draw upon isn't it about time we stop trying to analogize everything to World War II? Analogies are only useful when they fit in their most essential elements.

Sure, the US forces in Baghdad put a wall around an area. So then the wall around the Gaza Strip and the wall around the West Bank are like the Warsaw ghetto. The wall sections along the US-Mexican border are like the Warsaw ghetto. The Great Wall of China is like the Warsaw ghetto. The Wailing Wall in Jerusalem is like the Warsaw ghetto. Hadrian's Wall was like the Warsaw ghetto. The wall that used to be around West Berlin was also like the Warsaw ghetto. Walls around gated communities are like the Warsaw ghetto (never mind their protective purpose). I could go on...

On a similar note: Islamo-fascist is a term that does not work. John Derbyshire agrees with my arguments on this point.

John S Bolton said at April 21, 2007 9:59 PM:

Or, maybe it would, if you live in a screenhouse or gazebo.
People who live in mosquito-netting houses shouldn't throw darts.
Openness to aggression is the problem.
The better closed-off from their enemies' freedom-for-aggression
the likely victim groups are, the less they will see terrrorists as being their possible saviours.
Counterinsurgency doctrines have long placed special emphasis on the vulnerability of
populations subject to guerilla terror, to being drawn into subjection to those
insurgents, and to giving up hope in the capacity of the central government to protect them.
At least the men in the field see that slogans about brotherhood, equlaity, unity, reconciliation and power-sharing,
are empty and unheard, without counter-aggressional devices,
which do not assume that their can be no enemies.
Why does the international zone need walls,
because there has not been enough preachment
of unity, fraternity, anti-discrimination, and the like?

Bob Badour said at April 23, 2007 3:50 PM:
Their faith is strong. Their willingness to accept the evidence of empirical reality quite a bit less so.

Jorge Bush: Strong like bull. Smart like ox.

Post a comment
Name (not anon or anonymous):
Email Address:
Remember info?

Web parapundit.com
Go Read More Posts On ParaPundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright