2004 June 13 Sunday
Fifth Of London Marriages Faked For Immigration

Fake marriages are becoming very widely used to stay in the UK.

Up to a fifth of wedding ceremonies in London could be bogus, a senior registrar warned today.

Officials fear the government's drive on immigration has triggered a surge in fake marriages.

Mark Rimmer, service director for registrations of births, deaths and marriages, believes rising numbers of foreigners are organising the ceremonies in a desperate bid to stay in the UK.

Rimmer sounds fairly confident the number is high.

"You are looking at one in five marriages in London being bogus.

The marriages are being made by non-EU citizens to citizens of various European Union countries. (Daily Telegraph free registration required)

Fake marriages typically involve a partner from the European Union, usually a "bride" from Portugal, France or Holland, and someone from outside, primarily North Africa or Turkey.

Registrars say that they regularly see cases in which couples sit refusing to face each other and flinch when they kiss. In one case when a bride was asked the name of the man she wanted to marry she had to first read it out of the passport.

This comes on the heels of the claims of another government official that immigration may be far higher than the official numbers indicate. (Daily Telegraph free registration required)

Immigration could be running at six times higher than official figures, a Home Office official told a court yesterday.

Robert Owen said he could not even "guesstimate" the true number of foreign nationals living in Britain.

The Manchester Chinese community is 6 times larger than official estimates.

Called to the trial to give an overview of the situation he claimed that up to 1,000 people a day were at one time arriving at Heathrow’s Terminal 3 claiming asylum.

He also claimed that the Chinese community in Manchester put the true number of people from China living in the city at up to 50,000 more than six times official estimates.

Britain is fortunate in one respect as compared to the United States: The British elites feel so pressured by an angry populace that the government's official position now is that immigration has to be reduced. America's elite continues to defy the wishes of the majority and to work toward increasing the immigrant flow into the United States. An example of this is the AgJobs amnesty which now has 62 sponsors in the US Senate.

The United States needs a new political party. In Britain the UK Independence Party shows signs of becoming a contender that can threaten the existing status quo. Given that the Republican leaders have decided to be just as traitorous as the Democrats we desperately need a new political party.

Share |      By Randall Parker at 2004 June 13 05:02 PM  Immigration Border Control


Comments
Fly said at June 13, 2004 5:26 PM:

In the early twentieth century many Chinese immigrated to the US by falsely claiming to be related to Chinese-Americans. Sons took their “father’s” names.

Brock said at June 14, 2004 9:07 AM:

Unfortunately for us, the US's winner take all eletoral system makes it very hard for a new party to break in. It's really a much easier strategy (not easy, just easier) for 'radicals' to break in to an established party at the primary level, and then run as a Dem or Republican at the main election.

It would sure be a lot less confusing though if the party lines and positions were more clear. It would be nice to be able to vote for a 'selection' of people to have a 'tailor made' government platform, but there are costs to that to.

As is, Ralph Nader & Pat Buchannon will never hold office in the US - but they probably have enough support to get into a US Parliament. Do you really want people that far out on the fringe to be in government? Do you want a small Green Party or Reform Party being the linchpin in a coalition, and therefore having influence beyond their actual mandate? I'm not sure I do.

Not a perfect system, but then I haven't seen one that it.

lindenenii said at June 14, 2004 10:55 AM:

Our press is to blame as well. If they actually covered the costs of our current immigration rate, then there would be more of an outcry.

I suspect the elites won't be able to ignore the immigration issue any longer if there is another terrorist attack.

Maria said at August 7, 2004 12:51 AM:

Hi,
its a fairly educational article ,,, however i strongly belive that its no harm to marry for entry in the UK !! What could possibly go wrong nyway? I mean I am a 19 year old educated girl , on getting married to a UK citizen I will be certainly avoiding all the tensions of applying for the visa , the expences and the destruction of self-ego if your visa gets cancelled....
nyways your are wrong because i do intend to marry in order to come and visit the UK and stay there !!!!
its educational because i never had an idea that others did it too.


Post a comment
Comments:
Name (not anon or anonymous):
Email Address:
URL:
Remember info?

      
 
Web parapundit.com
Go Read More Posts On ParaPundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright ©